Notes
Outline
Slide 1
Great Lakes National Program Office
USEPA
Monitoring Required by GLWQA
 Began in 1983
Current Sampling Includes:
Phytoplankton
Zooplankton
Benthos
Physical/Chemical Parameters
Great Lakes National Program Office
Focus on Offshore Waters
Emphasis on Spatial Coverage
Biannual Sampling
Spring mixed
Summer stratified
Slide 4
TOPICS
Phytoplankton
Community Composition, Biomass
Deep Chlorophyll Maximum
Historical Communities
Crustacean Zooplankton
Community Composition
Size Structure of Community
Slide 6
Slide 7
Phytoplankton - Conclusions
Productivity Similar to Other Upper Lakes - Intermediate Between Superior and Michigan
Diatoms Dominant Group in Spring
Summer/Fall dominated by Chrysophytes, Diatoms
North/South Differentiation?
Summer Community Similar to Superior
Slide 9
Slide 10
DCM Comparison:
Shade Adaptation
No Increase in Biomass
Improved Nutrient Status
Higher Nutrients at Depth?
Shade Adaptation
Increase in Biomass
Improved Nutrient Status
Higher Nutrients at Depth
Slide 12
Slide 13
Slide 14
Historical Summer Phytoplankton Communities
Greater Proportion of Diatoms, Compared to Michigan
Indicative of lesser degree of historical eutrophication?
Non-Diatoms Mostly Chrysophytes
Slightly Lower Levels of Biovolume
Slide 16
Slide 17
Slide 18
Zooplankton - Conclusions
Community Makeup:
Spring:
Diaptomid copepods dominate
Copepodites abundant
Summer:
D. galeata mendotae, Diaptomids dominate
Biomass Higher in Summer
High Degree of Spatial Homogeneity
Slide 20
Slide 21
Slide 22
Slide 23
Slide 24
Slide 25
Slide 26
Mills et al. 1987
Slide 28
Zooplankton - Conclusions
Majority of Individuals Small (< 1 mm)
Majority of Biomass (64.7%) From Large Individuals
Mean Size of Community Indicative of High Piscivore/Planktivore Ratio
Slide 30
Slide 31
Slide 32
Slide 33
DCM - Conclusions
Deep Chlorophyll Maximum Probably Due To:
Change in configuration of chloroplast
Shade adaptation
No Evidence Of Biomass Maximum At Depth
Some Evidence Of Improved Nutrient Status At Depth
Slide 35
Slide 36